Back

Medical Image Analysis: Progress over Two Decades and the Challenges Ahead

J. DuncanN. Ayache

article2000TPAMI1,317 citations

Synthesizes twenty years of foundational advances in medical image analysis across segmentation, registration, motion tracking, and image-guided surgery while defining critical open problems for integrating biomechanical models and physiological data.

Listen

Medical imaging technology has advanced rapidly, producing large volumes of complex three-dimensional and time-varying data across modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. However, translating these complex datasets into accurate clinical decisions and interventions presents major computational challenges due to anatomical variability, soft tissue deformation, and the need for precision. Understanding the evolution of computational techniques in this domain is essential to identifying proven methods and directing future investments toward unresolved challenges.

The article reviews the development of medical image analysis methodologies from approximately 1980 through 1999, identifying key technical transitions, clinical milestones, and remaining strategic priorities for the discipline.

To conduct this evaluation, the authors performed a comprehensive historical review spanning two decades of progress across four distinct eras: early two-dimensional image processing, knowledge-based systems, optimization-driven three-dimensional analysis, and advanced image-guided intervention. The review examined core computational tasks—including image segmentation, image registration, nonrigid motion tracking, and physical modeling—using evidence from clinical literature, landmark algorithms, and comparative validation studies.

The review establishes several primary findings. First, the field transitioned from heuristic, rule-based expert systems to rigorous mathematical optimization frameworks, such as deformable surfaces, level sets, and nonlinear registration algorithms. Second, information-theoretic intensity-based registration (notably mutual information) and robust point matching proved to be highly effective across multiple imaging modalities without requiring tedious prior segmentation. Third, functional and dynamic analysis matured significantly through noninvasive techniques like magnetic resonance tagging, which enabled direct tracking of internal soft tissue motion such as cardiac strain. Fourth, advanced image analysis transitioned into direct clinical utility, powering commercial workstations, diagnostic screening tools in mammography, and image-guided surgical planning systems for neurosurgery and vascular interventions.

These findings demonstrate that medical image analysis has become an independent, rigorous scientific discipline rather than a simple offshoot of general computer vision. For healthcare organizations and technology developers, these mature computational tools offer opportunities to improve surgical accuracy, lower procedural risk, and enable minimally invasive interventions. However, the analysis also reveals that treating processing steps in isolation and relying on rigid anatomical assumptions can degrade performance when soft tissues deform intraoperatively.

To capitalize on existing progress and overcome current bottlenecks, research and engineering teams should adopt three concrete next steps. First, developers must integrate physical and biomechanical modeling directly into registration frameworks to account for real-time tissue deformations, such as brain shift during surgery. Second, researchers must establish tighter feedback loops between image acquisition physics and downstream analysis algorithms. Third, funding bodies and institutional leaders should prioritize the creation of standardized, open-access validation databases with verified ground truth to rigorously benchmark competing algorithms.

Readers should note that confidence remains tempered by a persistent lack of standardized, large-scale clinical validation datasets across the broader field. Many published algorithms remain sensitive to initial starting conditions and variations in imaging equipment. Consequently, stakeholders should exercise caution and require rigorous site-specific testing before deploying automated segmentation and nonrigid registration tools into routine, high-stakes clinical practice.

medical imagesmedical image analysisimage-guided surgeryimage registration algorithms
Duncan et al (2000).pdf
Cover for Medical Image Analysis: Progress over Two Decades and the Challenges Ahead

Topics

medical images

Keywords

medical image analysisimage-guided surgeryimage registration algorithmsimage segmentationgray matter segmentationdigital subtraction angiographydiagnostic imagingmagnetic resonance imagesechocardiographic imagesmammographic image

Table of Contents

  • 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
  • 2 PRE-1980 TO 1984: THE ERA OF PATTERN RECOGNITION ANALYSIS OF 2D IMAGES
  • 3 1985-1991: KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACHES INFLUENCE THE FIELD
  • 3.1 Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD)
  • 3.2 Image Segmentation
  • 3.3 Image Registration/Matching
  • 3.4 Motion Analysis
  • 4 1992-1998: 3D IMAGES AND TOWARD MORE INTEGRATED ANALYSIS
  • 4.1 Methodology Development: Optimization-Based Decision Making and Information Integration Dominate
  • 4.1.1 Image Segmentation
  • 4.1.2 Image Registration
  • 4.1.3 Analysis of Structure/Morphology
  • 4.1.4 Analysis of Function, Including Motion and Deformation
  • 4.1.5 Physics-Based Models
  • 4.2 New Application Areas: Toward Image-Guided Interaction During Intervention
  • 5 1999 AND BEYOND: MANY DIFFICULT CHALLENGES REMAIN
  • 5.1 Key Challenges
  • 5.2 Summary
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • REFERENCES

Knowls

  1. Knowl 1 — Historical Four-Era Paradigm of Medical Image Analysis

    model/method

    The methodology of medical image analysis evolved across four distinct eras defined by image dimensionality, computational modeling paradigms, and clinical objectives:

    1. Pre-1980 to 1984 (2D Heuristic Analysis): Analysis of planar images using contrast edge detection, heuristic contour linking, rigid 2D image subtraction for digital subtraction angiography (DSA), crude 2D radial wall motion calculation of the left ventricle from end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) projections, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for task-specific human observer performance.
    2. 1985–1991 (Knowledge-Based Systems and Multiparameter Imaging): Integration of artificial intelligence, domain-specific semantic networks, and rule-based expert systems; early computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for mammography; statistical clustering (minimum spanning tree, fuzzy clustering) for brain tissue classification using multi-echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) parameters (T1T_1, T2T_2, proton density); scale-space hierarchies; and early 3D surface-based multimodality registration.
    3. 1992–1998 (Optimization, 3D Volumetric Imaging, and Biomechanical Models): Transition to energy-minimization formulations in 3D; active contours, balloon models, and Active Shape Models (ASMs); implicit PDE front propagation via level sets and coupled level sets; simultaneous MRI bias field correction and Expectation-Maximization tissue classification; voxel-based registration using mutual information; continuum mechanics (viscous fluid and elastic transformations); and nonrigid myocardial deformation tracking from MR tagging (SPAMM) and phase-contrast velocity imaging.
    4. 1999 and Beyond (Interactive and Image-Guided Intervention): Integration of real-time intraoperative tracking (structured light, intraoperative ultrasound, intraoperative MRI), biomechanical brain shift modeling, endovascular simulation, and multi-scale data fusion from organ level to cellular and molecular biology.

  2. Knowl 2 — Coupled Level Set Method for Cortical Gray Matter Segmentation

    model/method

    To segment the highly convoluted human cerebral cortex from 3D volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data, surface deformation is formulated using level set methods where boundaries propagate as the zero level set of an implicit higher-dimensional function driven by partial differential equations.

    To capture the complex morphology and prevent numerical instabilities, two surfaces are evolved simultaneously: an inner surface representing the gray matter/white matter interface, and an outer surface representing the gray matter/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) interface. The evolution of both surfaces is coupled by a spatial constraint enforcing that the cortical gray matter mantle has an approximately uniform thickness throughout the cortex. This coupling enforces two regularization properties:

    1. The inner surface is prevented from collapsing into the CSF space across thin sulcal regions.
    2. The outer surface is prevented from expanding into non-brain skull and scalp tissues.

  3. Knowl 3 — Simultaneous MRI Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction and Tissue Classification via Expectation-Maximization

    model/method

    Spatial intensity variations in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) caused by radiofrequency (RF) coil sensitivity nonhomogeneities (the bias field) degrade the accuracy of standard intensity-based segmentation algorithms. The coupled problem is solved using an Expectation-Maximization (EM) optimization framework that alternates iteratively between two estimation steps:

    1. Classification Step (Expectation): Given the current estimate of the smoothly varying spatial bias field, the original MR image intensities are corrected, and probabilistic posterior assignments of tissue classes (e.g., gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) are computed at every voxel based on statistical intensity distributions.
    2. Bias Field Estimation Step (Maximization): Given the current probabilistic tissue classification, the spatial bias field is estimated and regularized as a smooth low-frequency artifact across the image domain.

    This iterative alternation removes the requirement for a separate pre-processing intensity standardization step and enables robust automatic segmentation of volumetric brain MR data.

  4. Knowl 4 — Information-Theoretic Registration of Multimodal 3D Medical Images via Mutual Information

    model/method

    Multimodal 3D image registration aligns volumetric datasets acquired from differing imaging modalities (e.g., MRI, CT, SPECT, PET, or ultrasound) that depict differing physical properties and lack a direct linear relationship between voxel intensities. The spatial transformation T\mathbf{T} that aligns a floating volume BB to a reference volume AA is determined by maximizing the mutual information I(A,T(B))I(A, \mathbf{T}(B)) derived from information theory:

    I(A,T(B))=H(A)+H(T(B))−H(A,T(B))I(A, \mathbf{T}(B)) = H(A) + H(\mathbf{T}(B)) - H(A, \mathbf{T}(B))

    where H(A)H(A) and H(T(B))H(\mathbf{T}(B)) are the marginal Shannon entropies of the reference volume and transformed floating volume, respectively, and H(A,T(B))H(A, \mathbf{T}(B)) is their joint entropy estimated from the 2D joint intensity histogram of overlapping voxels.

    Mutual information requires no prior feature extraction or segmentation of anatomical boundaries, is invariant to nonlinear monotonic relationships across modality intensity scales, and robustly estimates both rigid (translation and rotation) and affine transformations.

  5. Knowl 5 — Surface-Based 3D Registration Using Differential Geometric Crest Lines

    model/method

    In surface-based registration of segmented anatomical structures (such as skull or cortical surfaces in 3D CT and MRI), geometric feature extraction provides invariant anchors for alignment. Crest lines are defined as the locus of points on a curved 3D surface where the maximum principal curvature k1k_1 attains a local maximum along its associated principal curvature direction t1\mathbf{t}_1.

    Because crest lines represent intrinsic differential geometric invariants under rigid transformations, they remain stable across imaging modalities and subject repositioning. The matching algorithm extracts crest lines from both segmented volumes and estimates the spatial registration parameters by matching these curve networks (e.g., via geometric hashing or iterative closest point variants), thereby resolving feature correspondence and transformation parameters simultaneously.

  6. Knowl 6 — Hierarchical Continuum Biomechanical and Viscous Fluid Models for Nonrigid Registration

    model/method

    Nonrigid inter-subject registration and atlas warping to patient anatomy require non-affine, highly nonlinear spatial transformations to account for morphological variations. A two-stage continuum mechanics deformation model is used:

    1. Global Elastic Matching: A linear elastic model deforms the template atlas to achieve global alignment and broad anatomical shape correspondence.
    2. Local Viscous Fluid Matching: To resolve large, localized displacements without causing grid tearing, topology violation, or negative Jacobian determinants, the deformation is subsequently governed by the partial differential equations of viscous fluid mechanics (Navier-Stokes formulations).

    This fluid formulation allows the displacement field to relax elastically over time while generating smooth, continuous topological mappings that accommodate localized anatomical deformations.

  7. Knowl 7 — 3D Nonrigid Cardiac Myocardial Motion and Strain Recovery from MR Tagging

    model/method

    Quantifying regional left ventricular (LV) function requires tracking material points across the 3D cardiac cycle. Spatial Modulation of Magnetization (SPAMM) MR tagging applies spatial saturation prepulses at end-diastole (ED) to form a grid of dark tags on the myocardium that deform along with the contracting tissue until T1T_1 relaxation causes the tags to fade near end-systole (ES).

    To compute continuous strain tensors throughout the myocardial volume, tag intersection lines identified across orthogonal slice planes serve as external displacement forces coupled to a 3D finite element model governed by Lagrangian mechanics. The fitted volumetric deformable model recovers dense displacement fields and extracts complex nonrigid dynamics, including the characteristic myocardial twisting and radial thickening throughout systole.

  8. Knowl 8 — Physics-Based Intraoperative Brain Shift Compensation for Image-Guided Neurosurgery

    model/method

    During craniotomy and neurosurgical intervention, opening the skull and the subsequent loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) causes brain tissue to deform and sag by up to 1 cm1\text{ cm} (brain shift), rendering high-resolution preoperative 3D structural (MRI/CT) and functional (fMRI/PET) plans spatially inaccurate.

    To restore intraoperative geometric accuracy, intraoperative sensors (e.g., structured light range imaging of the exposed cortex, intraoperative ultrasound, or intraoperative low-field MRI) collect sparse intraoperative shape measurements. These measurements act as boundary constraints driving a continuum biomechanical forward model—such as a 3D linear elastic solid mechanics model, a mass-spring network, or a porous soil mechanics model accounting for fluid drainage—to warp and update the dense preoperative anatomical and functional volumes in near real time.

  9. Knowl 9 — Semiautomated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Modeling and Simulation Pipeline

    model/method

    For minimally invasive endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), preoperative planning and interventional training are performed using a multi-step CT Angiography (CTA) processing pipeline:

    1. Central Axis Tracking: A central vessel trajectory through the lumen of the aorta, iliac, and femoral arteries is automatically detected.
    2. Boundary Segmentation: Vessel walls and intraluminal thrombus regions are segmented relative to the central axis to reconstruct a 3D anatomical surface mesh of the patient's vasculature.
    3. Trajectory and Deployment Simulation: Deformable models (such as deformable B-splines) simulate the insertion path and mechanical opening of the folded stent-graft prosthesis within the patient-specific 3D vascular model.
    4. Fluoroscopy Synthesis: The 3D model generates synthetic 2D projection fluoroscopy images for simulated, radiation-free rehearsal of the catheterization procedure.

  10. Knowl 10 — Core Foundational Challenges in Medical Image Analysis

    limitation

    Medical image analysis faces four primary theoretical and methodological bottlenecks:

    1. Pathological and Multi-Scale Integration: Most models assume normal anatomical topologies and fail in the presence of lesions, tumors, or severe disease; furthermore, macroscopic organ-level imaging remains largely disconnected from microscopic, cellular, and genomic data.
    2. Decoupling of Acquisition Physics and Analysis: Image processing algorithms are typically developed independently of the physics of image formation (e.g., MRI kk-space sampling or RF coil parameters), lacking closed-loop feedback between analysis performance and acquisition parameter selection.
    3. Absence of Unified Theoretical Principles: The discipline relies on ad-hoc task-specific algorithms rather than unified core principles. Inter-subject/atlas alignment fundamentally requires differential geometric invariant descriptions, whereas intra-subject longitudinal/temporal tracking requires continuum physics-based biomechanical models.
    4. Lack of Standardized Validation Frameworks: Algorithms are predominantly evaluated on small, unstandardized local institutional datasets without common reference databases, rigorous ground truth benchmarks, or systematic comparison with physical image quality assessment paradigms.

Coverage note — None was omitted; the knowls cover the historical framework, the segmentation paradigms (coupled level sets, EM bias field correction), 3D multimodal and nonrigid registration methods, cardiac deformation tracking from MR tagging, intraoperative brain shift modeling, endovascular simulation pipelines, and the core open research challenges presented in the paper.

References

  1. 1.H.W. Strauss et al., "A Scintiphotographic Method for Measuring Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Man Without Cardiac Catheterization," Am. J. Cardiology, vol. 28, pp. 985-991, Nov. 1971.
  2. 2.J. Sklansky and D. Ballard, "Tumor Detection in Radiographs," Computers and Biomedical Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 299-321, Aug. 1973.
  3. 3.S. Pizer and A.E. Todd-Pokropek, "Improvement of Scintigrams by Computer Processing," Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 125-146, Apr. 1978.
  4. 4."Forward," Proc. Information Processing on Medical Imaging, A. Kuba, M. Samal, and A. Todd-Pokropek, eds., pp. 1-508, 1999.
  5. 5.G. Gerig, T. Pun, and O. Ratib, "Image Analysis and Computer Vision in Medicine," Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 85-96, 1994.
  6. 6.N. Ayache, "Medical Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics," Image and Vision Computing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 295-313, 1995. also available at http://www.inria.fr/epidaure/personnel/ayache/ayache.html.
  7. 7.T. McInerney and D. Terzopolous, "Deformable Models in Medical Image Analysis: A Survey," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 91-108, 1996.
  8. 8.J.B.A. Maintz and M.A. Viergever, "A Survey of Medical Image Registration," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 1998.
  9. 9.R. Shahidi, R. Tombropoulos, and R.P.A. Grzeszczuk, "Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Rendering of Medical Data Sets," Proc. IEEE, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 555-568, Mar. 1998.
  10. 10.S. Lavallee, "Registration for Computer Integrated Surgery: Methodology and State of the Art," Computer Integrated Surgery. R. Taylor, S. Lavallee, G. Burdea, and R. Mosges, eds., pp. 77-97, MIT Press, 1996.
  11. 11.Proc. Int'l Symp. Medical Imaging and Interpretation (ISMII), pp. 1-607, 1982.
  12. 12.W. Schlegel, H. Scharfenberg, J. Doll, O. Pastyr, V. Sturm, G. Netzebend, and W. Lorenz, "CT Images as the Basis of Operation Planning in Stereotactic Neurosurgery," Proc. Int'l Symp. Medical Imaging and Interpretation (ISMII), pp. 172-177, 1982.
  13. 13.M. Yachida, M. Ykeda, and S. Tsuji, "A Plan-Guided Analysis of Cineangiograms for Measurement of Dynamic Behavior of the Heart Wall," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 537-543, 1980.
  14. 14.A. Martelli, "An Application of Heuristic Search Methods to Edge and Contour Detection," Comm. ACM, vol. 19, pp. 73-83, 1976.
  15. 15.M. Yanagisawa, "Registration of Locally Distorted Images by Multiwindow Pattern Matching and Displacement Interpolation: The Proposal of an Algorithm and Its Application to Digital Subtraction Angiography," Proc. Seventh Int'l Conf. Pattern Recognition, M. Levine, ed., pp. 1,288-1,291, 1984.
  16. 16.M. Fitzpatrick, J. Greffenstette, D. Pickens, M. Mazer, and J. Perry, "A System for Image Registration in Digital Subtraction Angiography," Information Processing in Medical Imaging. C. de Graaf and M. Viergever, eds., pp. 415-434, Plenum, 1987.
  17. 17.E. Meijering, W. Niessen, and M. Viergever, "Retrospective Motion Correction in Digital Subtractive Angiography: A Review," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 2-21, 1999.
  18. 18.A. Klein, F. Lee, and A. Amini, "Quantitative Coronary Angiography with Deformable Spline Models," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 468-482, 1997.
  19. 19.H. Gelberg, B. Brundage, S. Glantz, and W. Parmley, "Quantitative Left Ventricular Wall Motion Analysis: A Comparison of Area, Chord and Radial Methods," Circulation, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 991-1,000, 1979.
  20. 20.M. Fujita, S. Sasayama, C. Kawai, S. Eiho, and M. Kuwahara, "Automatic Processing of Cineventriculograms for Analysis of Regional Myocardial Function," Circulation, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1,065-1,074, 1981.
  21. 21.C.E. Metz, "Evaluation of Image Quality by ROC Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, and Future Possibilities," Japanese J. Radiological Technology, vol. 4, pp. 990-1,002, 1985.
  22. 22.C.E. Metz, "ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging," Investigative Radiology, vol. 21, pp. 720-733, 1986.
  23. 23.H. Barrett and C. Abbey, "Bayesian Detection of Random Signals on Random Backgrounds," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, J. Duncan and G. Gindi, eds., pp. 155-166, 1997.
  24. 24.H. Barrett, K. Myers, and R. Wagner, "Beyond Signal Detection Theory," Proc. SPIE, vol. 626, pp. 231-239, 1986.
  25. 25.S. Zucker and R. Hummel, "A Three-Dimensional Edge Operator," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 324-330, 1981.
  26. 26.R. Schudy and D. Ballard, "Model-Detection of Cardiac Chambers in Ultrasound Images," Technical Report TR12, Computer Science Dept., Univ. of Rochester, Nov. 1978.
  27. 27.R. Bajcsy, R. Lieberson, and M. Reivich, "A Computerized System for Elastic Matching of Deformed Radiographic Images to Idealized Atlas Images," J. Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 7, pp. 618-625, 1983.
  28. 28.H.P. Chan et al. "Improvements in Radiologists' Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Mammograms: The Potential of Computer-Aided Diagnosis," Investigative Radiology, vol. 25, pp. 1,102-1,110, 1990.
  29. 29.H.P. Chan, K. Doi, S. Galhotra, C.J. Vyborny, H. MacMahon, and P.M. Jokich, "Image Feature Analysis and Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Digital Radiography: Part 1 Automated Detection of Microcalcifications in Mammography," Medical Physics, vol. 14, pp. 538-548, 1987.
  30. 30.F. Shtern, M. Vannier, and D. Winfield, "Report of the Working Group on Digital Mammography: Computer Aided Diagnosis and 3D Image Analysis and Display," Technical Report, U.S. Public Health Services's Office on Women's Health and the Nat'l Cancer Inst., Cambridge, Mass., Oct. 1998
  31. 31.H. Niemann, H. Bunke, I. Hofmann, G. Sagerer, F. Wolf, and H. Feistel, "A Knowledge Based System for Analysis of Gated Blood Pool Studies," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 246-259, 1985.
  32. 32.J.S. Duncan, "Knowledge Directed Left Ventricular Boundary Detection in Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiocardiography," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 325-336, 1987.
  33. 33.C. Han, K. Lin, W. Wee, R. Mintz, and D. Purembka, "Knowledge-Based Image Analysis for Automated Boundary Extraction of Transesophageal Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Images," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 4, pp. 602-610, Dec. 1991.
  34. 34.M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulus, "Snakes: Active Contour Models," Int'l J. Computer Vision, vol. 1, pp. 312-331, 1988.
  35. 35.M. O'Donnell, J. Gore, and W. Adams, "Towards an Automated Algorithm for NMR imaging II: Initial Segmentation Algorithm," Medical Physics, vol. 13, pp. 293-297, 1986.
  36. 36.D. Ortendahl and J. Carlson, "Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images Using Fuzzy Clustering," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. C. de Graaf and M. Viergever, eds., pp. 91-106, 1987.
  37. 37.J. Koenderinck, "The Structure of Images," Biological Cybernetics, vol. 50, pp. 363-370, 1984.
  38. 38.J. Gauch, W. Oliver, and S. Pizer, "Multiresolution Shape Descriptions and Their Applications in Medical Imaging," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. C. de Graaf and M. Viergever, eds., pp. 131-49, 1987.
  39. 39.C. de Graaf, K. Vincken, M. Viergever, J. Koenderinck, F. Appelman, and O. Ying Lie, "A Hyperstack for the Segmentation of 3D Images," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, D.A. Ortendahl and J. Llacer, eds, pp. 399-413, 1989.
  40. 40.D. Fritsch, S. Pizer, L. Yu, V. Johnson, and E. Chaney, "Segmentation of Medical Image Objects Using Deformable Shape Loci," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, J. Duncan and G. Gindi, eds., pp. 127-140, 1997.
  41. 41.D. Morris, "An Evaluation of the Use of Texture Measures for Tissue Characterization of Ultraound Images of in Vivo Human Placenta," Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 387-395, 1988.
  42. 42.J. Meunier, M. Bertrand, and G. Mailloux, "A Model for Dynamic Texture Analysis in Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms of the Myocardium," Proc. SPIE Pattern Recognition Acoustical Image, vol. 768, pp. 193-200, 1987.
  43. 43.J. Meunier and M. Bertrand, "Ultrasonic Texture Motion Analysis: Theory and Simulation," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 293-300, 1995.
  44. 44.G. Jacob, J.A. Noble, M. Mulet-Parada, and A. Blake, "Evaluating a Robust Contour Tracker on Echocardiographic Sequences," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 63-75, 1999.
  45. 45.C.A. Pelizzari, G.T.Y. Chen, D.R. Spelbring, R.R. Weichselbaum, and C.-T. Chen, "Accurate Three-Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain," J. Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 13, pp. 20-26, 1989.
  46. 46.P.J. Besl and N.D. Mackay, "A Method for Registration of 3D Shapes," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 239-256, Feb. 1992.
  47. 47.J. Tsotsos, "Knowledge Organization and Its Role in Representation and Interpretation for Time-Varying Data: The ALVEN System," Computational Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16-32, Feb. 1985.
  48. 48.J. Duncan, R. Owen, L. Staib, and P. Anandan, "Measurement of Non-Rigid Motion Using Contour Shape Descriptors," Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, G. Medioni and B. Horn, eds., pp. 318-324, IEEE CS Press, 1991.
  49. 49.D. Metaxas and D. Terzopolous, "Constrained Deformable Superquadrics and Nonrigid Motion Tracking," Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, G. Medioni and B. Horn, eds., pp. 337-343, IEEE CS Press, 1991.
  50. 50.B. Horowitz and A. Pentland, "Recovery of Nonrigid Motion and Structure," Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, G. Medioni and B. Horn, eds., pp. 325-330, IEEE CS Press, 1991.
  51. 51.J. Park, D. Metaxas, and L. Axel, "Analysis of Left Ventricular Wall Motion Based on Volumetric Deformable Models and MRI-SPAMM," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53-71, 1996.
  52. 52.N.C. Andreasen, G. Harris, T. Cizadlo, S. Arndt, and D.S. O'Leary, "Techniques for Measuring Sulcal/Gyral Patterns in the Brain as Visualized through Magnetic Resonance Scanning: BRAINPLOT," Proc. Nat'l Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 90, pp. 93-97, Jan. 1994.
  53. 53.B.L. Holman, R.E. Zimmerman, K.A. Johnson, P.A. Carvalho, R.B. Schwartz, J.S. Loeffler, E. Alexander, C.A. Pelizzari, and G.T.Y. Chen, "Computer-Assisted Superimposition of Magnetic Resonance and High Resolution Technetium-99m-HMPAO and Thallium-201 SPECT Images of the Brain," J. Nuclear Medicine, vol. 32, pp. 1,478-1,484, 1991.
  54. 54.P. Thompson, D. MacDonald, M. Mega, C. Holmes, A. Evans, and A. Toga, "Detection and Mapping of Abnormal Brain Structure with a Probabilistic Atlas of Cortical Surfaces," J. Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 567-581, July 1997.
  55. 55.D. Dean, P. Buckley, F. Bookstein, J. Kamath, D. Kwon, L. Friedman, and C. Lys, "Three Dimensional MR-Based Morphometric Comparison of Schizophrenic and Normal Cerebral Ventricles," Visualization in Biomedical Computing, K.H. Hoehne and R. Kikinis, eds., pp. 363-372, Springer, 1996.
  56. 56.Proc. 1994 AAAI Spring Symp. Medical Applications of Computer Vision, W. Wells and E. Grimson, eds., pp. 1-200, Mar. 1994.
  57. 57.T. Dohi, E. Grimson, and R. Kikinis, "Preface," Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), W. Wells, A. Colchester, and S. Delp, eds., pp. 1-1,256, Springer, 1998.
  58. 58.L.D. Cohen and I. Cohen, "Finite Element Methods for Active Contour Models and Balloons for 2D and 3D Images," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1,131-1,147, Nov. 1993.
  59. 59.L.H. Staib and J.S. Duncan, "Model-Based Deformable Surface Finding for Medical Images," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 720-731, Oct. 1996.
  60. 60.T.F. Cootes, C.J. Taylor, D.H. Cooper, and J. Graham, "Active Shape Models—Their Training and Application," Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 38-59, 1995.
  61. 61.G. Székely, A. Kelemen, C. Brechbühler, and G. Gerig, "Segmentation of 3D Objects from MRI Volume Data Using Constrained Elastic Deformations of Flexible Fourier Surface Models," Computer Vision, Virtual Reality, and Robotics in Medicine. N. Ayache, ed., pp. 495-505, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
  62. 62.C. Xu and J. Prince, "A Generalized Gradient Vector Flow for Active Contour Models," Proc. Conf. Information Sciences and Systems, pp. 885-890, Mar. 1997.
  63. 63.S. Osher and J. Sethian, "Fronts Propagation with Curvature Dependent Speed: Algorithms Based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations," J. Computational Physics, vol. 79, pp. 12-49, 1988.
  64. 64.A. Yezzi, S. Kichenassamy, A. Kumar, P. Olver, and A. Tannenbaum, "A Geometric Snake Model for Segmentation of Medical Imagery," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 199-209, 1997.
  65. 65.P.C. Teo, G. Sapiro, and B.A. Wandell, "Creating Connected Representations of Cortical Gray Matter for Functional MRI Visualization," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 852-863, 1997.
  66. 66.R. Malladi, J.A. Sethian, and B.C. Vemuri, "Shape Modeling with Front Propagation: A Level Set Approach," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 17, pp. 158-175, 1995.
  67. 67.X. Zeng, L.H. Staib, R.T. Schultz, and J.S. Duncan, "Segmentation and Measurement of the Cortex from 3D MR Images," Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. pp. 519-530, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
  68. 68.L. Lorigo, O. Faugeras, W. Grimson, R. Keriven, R. Kikinis, and C. Westin, "Co-Dimension 2 Geodesic Active Contours for MRA Segmentation," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI), A. Kuba, M. Samal, and A. Todd-Pokropek, eds., pp. 126-139, 1999.
  69. 69.S.C. Zhu, T.S. Lee, and A.L. Yuille, "Region Competition: Unifying Snakes, Region Growing and Bayes/MDL for Multi-Band Image Segmentation," Proc. Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, 1995.
  70. 70.A. Chakraborty, L.H. Staib, and J.S. Duncan, "Deformable Boundary Finding in Medical Images by Integrating Gradient and Region Information," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 859-870, Dec. 1996.
  71. 71.T. Cootes, C. Beeston, G. Edwards, and C. Taylor, "A Unified Framework for Atlas Matching Using Active Appearance Models," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI99), pp. 322-333, Visegrad, Hungary, June 1999.
  72. 72.W.M. Wells, W. Grimson, R. Kikinis, and F.A. Jolesz, "Statistical Intensity Correction and Segmentation of MRI Data," Proc. Visualization of Biomedical Computing 1994, SPIE 2359, R.A. Robb, ed., pp. 148-159, 1994.
  73. 73.J. Sled, A. Zijdenbos, and A. Evans, "A Nonparametric Method for Automatic Correction of Intensity Nonhomogeneity in MRI Data," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 17, pp. 87-97, Feb. 1998.
  74. 74.D. Pham and J. Prince, "An Adaptive Fuzzy Segmentation Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Images," Information Processing in Medical Imaging. A. Kuba, M. Samal, and A. Todd-Pokropek, eds., pp. 140-153, 1999.
  75. 75.D.L. Collins, A.P. Zijdenbos, V. Kollokian, J.G. Sled, N.J. Kabani, C.J. Holmes, and A.C. Evans, "Design and Construction of a Realistic Digital Brain Phantom," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 463-468, June 1998.
  76. 76.J.C. Rajapakse and F. Fruggel, "Segmentation of MR Images with Intensity Inhomogeneities," Image and Vision Computing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 165-180, Mar. 1998. http://neuro-www.mgh.harvard.edu/cma/ibsr.
  77. 77.H. Jiang, K. Holton, and R. Robb, "Image Registration of Multi-Modality 3-D Medical Images by Chamfer Matching," Proc. SPIE Biomedical Image Processing and Three-Dimensional Microscopy, vol. 1,660, pp. 356-366, 1992.
  78. 78.R.A. Robb and D.P. Hanson, "A Software System for Interactive and Quantitative Visualization of Multidimensional Biomedical Images," Austalasian Physical and Eng. Sciences in Medicine, vol. 14, pp. 9-30, 1991.
  79. 79.J. Feldmar and N. Ayache, "Rigid, Affine and Locally Affine Registration of Free-Form Surfaces," Int'l. J. Computer Vision, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 99-119, May 1996.
  80. 80.A. Rangarajan, H. Chui, E. Mjolsness, S. Pappu, L. Davachi, P. Goldman-Rakic, and J. Duncan., "A Robust Point Matching Algorithm for Autoradiograph Alignment," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 379-398, 1997.
  81. 81.J.-P. Thirion, "New Feature Points Based on Geometric Invariants for 3D Image Registration," Int'l J. Computer Vision, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 121-137, May 1996.
  82. 82.A. Guéziec, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache, "Medical Image Registration Using Geometric Hashing," IEEE Computational Science and Eng., special issue on geometric hashing, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 29-41, Oct.-Dec. 1997.
  83. 83.R.P. Woods, J.C. Mazziotta, and S.R. Cherry, "MRI-PET Registration with Automated Algorithm," J. Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 536-546, 1993.
  84. 84.W. Wells III, P. Viola, H. Atsumi, S. Nakajima, and R. Kikinis, "Multi-Modal Volume Registration by Maximization of Mutual Information," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35-52, 1996.
  85. 85.F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, G. Marchal, and P. Suetens, "Multi-Modality Image Registration by Maximization of Mutual Information," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 187-198, 1997.
  86. 86.C.R. Meyer, J.L. Boes, B. Kim, P.H. Bland, G.L. LeCarpentier, J.B. Fowlkes, M.A. Roubidoux, and P.L. Carson, "Semiautomatic Registration of Volumetric Ultrasound Scans," Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 25, pp. 339-347, 1999.
  87. 87.J. West et al. "Comparison and Evaluation of Retrospective Intermodality Registration Techniques," J. Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 554-566, July-Aug. 1997.
  88. 88.A. Roche, G. Malandain, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache, "The Correlation Ratio as a New Similarity Measure for Multimodal Image Registration," Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 1998), pp. 1,115-1,123, Cambridge, Mass., Oct. 1998.
  89. 89.C.R. Meyer, J.L. Boes, B. Kim, P. Bland, K.R. Zasadny, P.V. Kison, K. Koral, K.A. Frey, and R.L. Wahl, "Demonstration of Accuracy and Clinical Versatility of Mutual Information for Automatic Multimodality Image Fusion Using Affine and Thin Plate Spline Warped Geometric Deformations," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 3, pp. 195-206, 1997.
  90. 90.F.L. Bookstein, "Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 567-585, June 1989.
  91. 91.F. Bookstein, "Shape and the Information in Medical Images: A Decade of the Morphometric Systhesis," Proc. Workshop Math. Methods in Medical Image Analysis, pp. 2-12, June 1996.
  92. 92.G. Christensen, R. Rabbitt, M. Miller, S. Joshi, U. Grenander, T. Coogan, and D. van Essen, "Topological Properties of Smooth Anatomic Maps" Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Y. Bizais, C. Barillot, and R. Di Paola, eds., pp. 101-112, 1995.
  93. 93.G.E. Christensen, M.I. Miller, U. Grenander, and M.W. Vannier, "Individualizing Neuroanatomical Atlases Using a Massively Parallel Computer," Computer, pp. 32-38, Jan. 1996.
  94. 94.M. Vaillant and C. Davatzikos, "Finding Parametric Representations of the Cortical Sulci Using an Active Contour Mode,l" Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 295-315, 1997.
  95. 95.B. Verdonck, R. Nijlunsing, J. Cheung, D. Wever, A. Veldhuizen, S. Devillers, and S. Makram-Ebeid, "Computer Assisted Quantitative Analysis of Deformities of Human Spine," Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. pp. 822-831, Berlin: Springer, 1998.
  96. 96.H. Benali, I. Buvat, J. Anton, M. Pelegrini, M. DiPaola, J. Bittoun, Y. Burnod, and R. DiPaola, "Space-Time Statistical Model for Functional MR Image Sequences," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI), pp. 285-298, 1997.
  97. 97.F. Kruggel and D. von Cramon, "Physiologically Oriented Models of Hemodynamic Response in Functional MRI," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pp. 294-307, 1999.
  98. 98.E. Zerhouni, D. Parish, W. Rogers, A. Yang, and E. Shapiro, "Human Heart Tagging with MR Imaging—A Method for Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Motion," Radiology, vol. 169, pp. 59-63, 1988.
  99. 99.L. Axel and L. Dougherty, "MR Imaging of Motion with Spatial Modulation of Magnetization," Radiology, vol. 171, pp. 841-845, 1989.
  100. 100.W. Kerwin and J. Prince, "Cardiac Material Markers from Tagged MR Images," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 339-354, 1998.
  101. 101.A. Amini, Y. Chen, R. Curwen, V. Mani, and J. Sun, "Coupled B-Snake Grids and Constrained Thin-Plate Splines for Analysis of 2D Tissue Deformations from Tagged MRI," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 17, pp. 344-356, 1998.
  102. 102.S.N. Gupta and J.L. Prince, "On Variable Brightness Optical Flow for Tagged MRI," Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pp. 323-334, June 1995.
  103. 103.N. Pelc, R. Herfkens, A. Shimakawa, and D. Enzmann, "Phase Contrast Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging," Magnetic Resonance Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 229-254, 1991.
  104. 104.R.T. Constable, K. Rath, A. Sinusas, and J. Gore, "Development and Evaluation of Tracking Algorithms for Cardiac Wall Motion Analysis Using Phase Contrast Velocity Imaging," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 32, pp. 33-42, 1994.
  105. 105.F. Meyer, R.T. Constable, A. Sinusas, and J. Duncan, "Tracking Myocardial Deformation Using Phase Contrast Velocity Fields: A Stochastic Approach," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 453-465, 1996.
  106. 106.C. Kambhamettu and D. Goldgof, "Curvature-Based Approach to Point Correspondence Recovery in Conformal Nonrigid Motion," CVGIP: Image Understanding, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 26-43, July 1994.
  107. 107.P. Shi, G. Robinson, R. Constable, A. Sinusas, and J. Duncan, "A Model-Based, Integrated Approach to Track Myocardial Deformation Using Displacement and Velocity Constraints," Proc. Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, E. Grimson, ed., pp. 687-693, June 1995.
  108. 108.S. Benayoun, C. Nastar, and N. Ayache, "Dense Non-Rigid Motion Estimation in Sequences of 3D Images Using Differential Constraints," Proc. Computer Vision, Virtual Reality, and Robotics in Medicine, pp. 309-318, 1995.
  109. 109.H.D. Tagare, "Non-Rigid Curve Correspondence for Estimating Heart Motion," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pp. 489-494, June 1997.
  110. 110.G. Gerig, D. Welti, C. Guttmann, A. Colchester, and G. Szekely, "Exploring the Discrimination Power of the Time Domain for Segmentation and Characterization of Lesions in Serial MR Data," Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. pp. 469-479, 1998.
  111. 111.D. Rey, G. Subsol, H. Delingette, and N. Ayache, "Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Evolving Processes in 3D Medical Images: Application to Multiple Sclerosis," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, IPMI 1999, A. Kuba, M. Samal, and A. Todd-Pokropek, eds., pp. 154-167, June 1999.
  112. 112.M. Sallam and K. Bowyer, "Registration and Difference Analysis of Corresponding Mammorgam Images," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103-118, 1999.
  113. 113.A. McCulloch and J. Omens, "Non-Homogeneous Analysis of Three-Dimensional Transmural Finite Deformation in Canine Ventricular Myocardium," J. Biomechanics, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 539-548, 1991.
  114. 114.E. Haber, D. Metaxas, and L. Axel, "Motion Analysis of the Right Ventricle from MR Images," Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, pp. 177-188, 1998.
  115. 115.S. Kyriacou and C. Davatzikos, "A Biomechanical Model of Soft Tissue Deformation, with Applications to Non-Rigid Registration of Brain Images with Tumor Pathology," Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. pp. 531-538, Berlin: Springer, 1998.
  116. 116.O. Skrinjar, D. Spencer, and J. Duncan, "Brain Shift Modeling for Use in Neurosurgery," Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, W. Wells, A. Colchester, and S. Delp, eds., pp. 641-649, 1998.
  117. 117.M. Miga, K. Paulsen, F. Kennedy, J. Hoopes, A. Hartov, and D. Roberts, "Initial in Vivo Analysis of 3D Heterogeneous Brain Computations for Model-Updated Image-Guided Neurosurgery," Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, W. Wells, A. Colchester, and S. Delp, eds., pp. 743-752, Springer, 1998.
  118. 118.R. Bucholz, R. Yeh, J. Trobaugh, L. McDurmont, C. Sturm, C. Baumann, J. Henderson, A. Levy, and P. Kessman, "The Correction of Stereotactic Inaccuracy Caused by Brain Shift Using an Intraoperative Ultrasound Device," Proc. Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine-Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, J. Troccaz, E. Grimson, and R. Mosges, eds., pp. 459-466, Mar. 1997.
  119. 119.P. Black, T. Moriarty, E. Alexander, P. Stieg, E. Woodard, L. Gleason, C. Martin, R. Kikinis, R. Schwartz, and F. Jolesz, "Development and Implementation of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Neurosurgical Applications," Neurosurgery, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 831-845, 1997.
  120. 120.W. Grimson, G. Ettinger, S. White, T. Lozano-Perez, W. Wells, and R. Kikinis, "An Automatic Registration Method for Frameless Stereotaxy, Image-Guided Surgery and Enhanced Reality Visualization," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 129-140, Apr. 1996.
  121. 121.C. Nikou, B. Jaramaz, and A. DiGioia, "Range of Motion after Total Hip Arthroplasty," Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, pp. 700-709, 1998.
  122. 122.C. Nikou, B. Jaramaz, A. DiGioia, M. Blackwell, M. Romesberg, and M. Green, "POP: Preoperative Planning and Simulation Software for Total Hip Replacement Surgery," Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. pp. 868-875, Springer, 1999.
  123. 123.S. Gibson, J. Samosky, A. Mor, C. Fyock, E. Grimson, T. Kanade, R. Kikinis, H. Lauer, N. McKenzie, S. Nakajima, H. Ohkami, R. Osborne, and A. Sawada, "Simulating Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Using Volumetric Object Representations," Proc. Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine-Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, J. Troccaz, E. Grimson, and R. Mosges, eds., pp. 369-378, Mar. 1997.
  124. 124.M. Breeuwer et al. "The EASI Project-Improving the Effectiveness and Quality of Image Guided Surgery," IEEE Trans. Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 156-168, 1998.
  125. 125.O. Wink, W.J. Niessen, and M.A. Viergever, "Fast Quantification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms from CTA Volumes," Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, pp. 138-145, 1998.
  126. 126.O. Wink, W.J. Niessen, J.J. Wever, I.A.J.M. Broeders, J.D. Blankensteijn, and M.A. Viergever, "Semi-Automated Quantification and Segmentation of Abdominal Aorta Aneurysms from CTA Volumes," Proc. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS 1999), pp. 208-212, 1999.
  127. 127.T. van Walsum and M.A. Viergever, "Deformable B-Splines for Catheter Simulation," Proc. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS 1999), pp. 999, 1999.
  128. 128.A. Colchester, J. Zhao, K. Holton-Tainter, C. Henri, N. Maitland, P. Roberts, C. Harris, and R. Evans., "Development and Preliminary Evaluation of VISLAN, A Surgical Planning and Guidance System Using Intra-Operative Video Imaging," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73-90, 1996.
  129. 129.Computer Integrated Surgery, R. Taylor, S. Lavalle, G. Burdea, and R. Moesges, eds. MIT Press, 1996.
  130. 130.R.A. Robb and D.P. Hanson, "ANALYZE: A Software System for Biomedical Image Analysis," Proc First Conf. Visualization Biomedical Computing, pp. 507-518, 1990.
  131. 131.Sensor Systems, MEDx software package, Sterling, Va., 1999. http://www.sensor.com.
  132. 132.Sofamor Danek, stealth station, Memphis, Tenn., 1999. http://www.sofamordanek.com.
  133. 133.NOMOS Corporation, PEACOCK software product, Sewickley, Pa., 1999. http://www.nomos.com.
  134. 134.D. Atkinson, D. Hill, P. Stoyle, P. Summers, and S. Keevil, "Automatic Correction of Motion Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Images Using an Entropy Focus Criterion," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 903-918, 1997.
  135. 135.C. Meyer, P. Bland, and J. Pipe, "Retrospective Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneities in MRI," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 14, pp. 36-41, 1997.
  136. 136.R. Highnam, M. Brady, and B. Shepstone, "A Representation for Mammographic Image Processing," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 1996.
  137. 137.M. Insana and T. Hall, "Parametric Ultrasound Imaging from Backscatter Coefficient Measurements: Image Formation and Interpretation," Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 12, pp. 245-267, 1990.
  138. 138.B. Tsui, E. Frey, X. Zhao, D. Lalush, R. Johnson, and W. McCartney, "The Importance and Implementation of Accurate 3D Compensation Methods for Quantitative Spect," Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, pp. 509-530, 1994.
  139. 139.P. Edwards, D. Hill, J. Little, and D. Hawkes, "Deformation for Image Guided Intervention Using a Three Component Tissue Model," Proc. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, J. Duncan and G. Gindi, eds., pp. 218-231, 1997.

Citation

MLA
Duncan, J. S., and N. Ayache. “Medical Image Analysis: Progress over Two Decades and the Challenges Ahead”. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 1, 2000, pp. 85–106, https://doi.org/10.1109/34.824822.
APA
Duncan, J. S., & Ayache, N. (2000). Medical image analysis: progress over two decades and the challenges ahead. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.824822
Chicago
Duncan, J. S., and N. Ayache. 2000. “Medical Image Analysis: Progress over Two Decades and the Challenges Ahead”. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22 (1): 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.824822.
Harvard
Duncan, J.S. and Ayache, N. (2000) “Medical image analysis: progress over two decades and the challenges ahead”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(1), pp. 85–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/34.824822.
Vancouver
1. Duncan JS, Ayache N (2000) Medical image analysis: progress over two decades and the challenges ahead. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22:85–106

BibTeX

@article{Duncan_2000, title={Medical image analysis: progress over two decades and the challenges ahead}, volume={22}, ISSN={2160-9292}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/34.824822}, DOI={10.1109/34.824822}, number={1}, journal={IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence}, publisher={Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)}, author={Duncan, J.S. and Ayache, N.}, year={2000}, month=Jan, pages={85–106} }
Metadata:Crossref

Access the Paper

This paper is available from its original source. Click below to access the PDF.

Open PDF