Built independently by an author, for readers. Read the story and support ChapterPal

keyword

word-emotion association lexicon

A word-emotion association lexicon is a computational linguistics resource that maps words or word senses to specific emotion categories and sentiment polarities based on their perceived affective associations. Unlike standard sentiment dictionaries that categorize language strictly by positive or negative valence, this type of lexicon captures nuanced emotional dimensions by linking terms to discrete emotional states, such as joy, sadness, anger, fear, disgust, surprise, anticipation, and trust. Typically constructed through crowdsourced human annotation or automated text analysis methods, these lexicons provide structured affective data used across natural language processing, affective computing, and computational social science to analyze emotional tone, track mood trajectories in text, and enhance automated language understanding models.

1 item

CROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON

CROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON

Saif M. Mohammad, Peter D. Turney

Why you should read this

Presents a practical crowdsourcing methodology for constructing large-scale word-emotion lexicons, proving that sense-verification questions and association-based framing substantially increase annotation quality and inter-annotator agreement.

Even though considerable attention has been given to the polarity of words (positive and negative) and the creation of large polarity lexicons, research in emotion analysis has had to rely on limited and small emotion lexicons. In this paper we show how the combined strength and wisdom of the crowds can be used to generate a large, high-quality, word-emotion and word-polarity association lexicon quickly and inexpensively. We enumerate the challenges in emotion annotation in a crowdsourcing scenario and propose solutions to address them. Most notably, in addition to questions about emotions associated with terms, we show how the inclusion of a word choice question can discourage malicious data entry, help identify instances where the annotator may not be familiar with the target term (allowing us to reject such annotations), and help obtain annotations at sense level (rather than at word level). We conducted experiments on how to formulate the emotion-annotation questions, and show that asking if a term is associated with an emotion leads to markedly higher inter-annotator agreement than that obtained by asking if a term evokes an emotion.

Added

2026-09-14