Built independently by an author, for readers. Read the story and support ChapterPal

keyword

Natural Instructions

Natural Instructions is a benchmark dataset and evaluation framework in natural language processing designed to train and assess the ability of language models to generalize to new, unseen tasks based on plain-language instructions. Rather than training models on task-specific data alone, the framework formats diverse tasks with structured, human-authored descriptions that typically include task definitions, constraints, and illustrative examples. This structure supports instruction tuning by enabling models to learn how to interpret task guidelines, which facilitates research into cross-task and cross-lingual zero-shot or few-shot generalization across a wide range of task categories and languages.

1 item

Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks

Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks

Po-Nien Kung, Fan Yin, Di Wu, Kai-Wei Chang, Nanyun Peng

OrganizationsUniversity of California, Los Angeles

Why you should read this

Proposes an active instruction tuning framework that quantifies prompt uncertainty to identify and train on the most informative tasks, achieving superior cross-task generalization with substantially fewer training datasets.

Instruction tuning (IT) achieves impressive zero-shot generalization results by training large language models (LLMs) on a massive amount of diverse tasks with instructions. However, how to select new tasks to improve the performance and generalizability of IT models remains an open question. Training on all existing tasks is impractical due to prohibiting computation requirements, and randomly selecting tasks can lead to suboptimal performance. In this work, we propose active instruction tuning based on prompt uncertainty, a novel framework to identify informative tasks, and then actively tune the models on the selected tasks. We represent the informativeness of new tasks with the disagreement of the current model outputs over perturbed prompts. Our experiments on NIV2 and Self-Instruct datasets demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms other baseline strategies for task selection, achieving better out-of-distribution generalization with fewer training tasks. Additionally, we introduce a task map that categorizes and diagnoses tasks based on prompt uncertainty and prediction probability. We discover that training on ambiguous (prompt-uncertain) tasks improves generalization while training on difficult (prompt-certain and low-probability) tasks offers no benefit, underscoring the importance of task selection for instruction tuning.¹

Added

2026-09-26