Built independently by an author, for readers. Read the story and support ChapterPal

keyword

multiple LLM agents

Multiple LLM agents are two or more AI agents powered by large language models that interact or coordinate to carry out a task, often by contributing different roles, assessments, or perspectives toward a shared result.

1 item

MAIN-RAG: Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation

MAIN-RAG: Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Chia-Yuan Chang, Zhimeng Jiang, Vineeth Rakesh, Menghai Pan, Chin-Chia Michael Yeh, Guanchu Wang, Mingzhi Hu, Zhichao Xu, Yan Zheng, Mahashweta Das, Na Zou

OrganizationsRice UniversityTexas A&M UniversityUniversity of HoustonUniversity of UtahVisa ResearchWorcester Polytechnic Institute

Why you should read this

Proposes a training-free multi-agent framework that uses dynamic score thresholds to filter out noisy retrieved documents, boosting question-answering accuracy by up to 11% without model fine-tuning.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming essential tools for various natural language processing tasks but often suffer from generating outdated or incorrect information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this issue by incorporating external, real-time information retrieval to ground LLM responses. However, the existing RAG systems frequently struggle with the quality of retrieval documents, as irrelevant or noisy documents degrade performance, increase computational overhead, and undermine response reliability. To tackle this problem, we propose Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MAIN-RAG), a training-free RAG framework that leverages multiple LLM agents to collaboratively filter and score retrieved documents. Specifically, MAIN-RAG introduces an adaptive filtering mechanism that dynamically adjusts the relevance filtering threshold based on score distributions, effectively minimizing noise while maintaining high recall of relevant documents. The proposed approach leverages inter-agent consensus to ensure robust document selection without requiring additional training data or fine-tuning. Experimental results across four QA benchmarks demonstrate that MAIN-RAG consistently outperforms traditional RAG approaches, achieving a 2–11% improvement in answer accuracy while reducing the number of irrelevant retrieved documents. Quantitative analysis further reveals that our approach achieves superior response consistency and answer accuracy over baseline methods, offering a competitive and practical alternative to training-based solutions.

Added

2026-10-03