Built independently by an author, for readers. Read the story and support ChapterPal

keyword

instruction mining

Instruction mining is the automated process of evaluating and selecting high-quality instruction-response data from larger or uncurated datasets to fine-tune large language models. Rather than training models on massive volumes of unfiltered text, this technique uses quantitative criteria, linguistic indicators, or model-based difficulty scores to pinpoint the most effective and informative training samples. By filtering out low-quality, noisy, or redundant examples, instruction mining reduces computational costs and data curation effort while improving a language model's ability to accurately understand and follow diverse human instructions.

1 item

From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning

From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning

Ming Li, Yong Zhang, Zhitao Li, Jiuhai Chen, Lichang Chen, Ning Cheng, Jianzong Wang, Tianyi Zhou, Jing Xiao

OrganizationsPing An Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.University of Maryland

Why you should read this

Proposes the Instruction-Following Difficulty metric to let large language models autonomously select high-impact training samples, outperforming full-dataset fine-tuning on Alpaca and WizardLM while using only ten percent of the data.

In the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), the balance between instruction data quality and quantity is a focal point. Recognizing this, we introduce a self-guided methodology for LLMs to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets, effectively minimizing manual curation and potential cost for instruction tuning an LLM. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability. Through the application of IFD, cherry samples can be pinpointed, leading to a marked uptick in model training efficiency. Empirical validations on datasets like Alpaca and WizardLM underpin our findings; with a mere 10% of original data input, our strategy showcases improved results. This synthesis of self-guided cherry-picking and the IFD metric signifies a transformative leap in the instruction tuning of LLMs, promising both efficiency and resource-conscious advancements. Codes, data, and models are available.

Added

2026-09-28